Are we what we eat?

-
Originally shared by ScienceDaily
http://dlvr.it/KwdvFv

Comments

  1. James NelsonMarch 30, 2016 at 4:46 PM

    Tried reading the article, but wasn't able understand the conclusion. Is it saying vegetarians experience risk of cancer increases if the switch from a vegetarian diet or non vegetarians have higher risk of cancer because they can't create the omega proteins from pants as easily as vegetarians?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Luca TamburelliMarch 31, 2016 at 8:16 AM

    I know vegetarian jerks and sweet, altruistic meet eaters. We're more than a digesting tube. I don't think Jessica believes that we are what we eat. I eat meat very seldom, but I think it has no influence on my temper.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

can't understand why in the US it's sooo much cheaper than in Europe, since the product is not even from there..

-
Image
can't understand why in the US it's sooo much cheaper than in Europe, since the product is not even from there.. US price:         $499   =  406 € German price:   689 € = $847 that's crazy! #samsung   #samsunggalaxy   #samsunggalaxynote101   #galaxynote101   Originally shared by Engadget If you had any doubts about what today's Samsung press event was about...  http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-liveblog/
Read more

The theory of multiple intelligences is a theory of intelligence that differentiates it into specific (primarily...

-
Image
Originally shared by Corina Marinescu The theory of multiple intelligences is a theory of intelligence that differentiates it into specific (primarily sensory) 'modalities', rather than seeing intelligence as dominated by a single general ability. This model was proposed by Howard Gardner in his 1983 book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. In the heyday of the psychometric and behaviorist eras, it was generally believed that intelligence was a single entity that was inherited; and that human beings – initially a blank slate – could be trained to learn anything, provided that it was presented in an appropriate way. Nowadays an increasing number of researchers believe precisely the opposite; that there exists a multitude of intelligences, quite independent of each other; that each intelligence has its own strengths and constraints; that the mind is far from unencumbered at birth; and that it is unexpectedly difficult to teach things that go against early ‘naiv...
Read more