#artificialintelligence
#artificialintelligence
Originally shared by Singularity 2045
Whether or not human level #artificialintelligence will be safe or dangerous, it should be clear it's logically impossible to justify a supposed AI risk via citing human treatment of animals. The #logicalfallacy of AI danger based on animal-human relationships should not be allowed to continue.
Wozniak recently cited pet dogs to justify AI fear. Tegmark cited tigers to justify AI fear. Yudkowsky in the past cited wolves. Hugo de Garis cited mosquitoes and ants. Bostrom cited gorillas.
AI #scaremongering by the aforementioned people is a joke. Their logical fallacies are via irrational, highly unintelligent, but nobody until now has exposed their fallacious reasoning concerning their animals-analogy.
After considering the following quotes, do you agree comparing human treatment of animals cannot remotely define hypothetical super-AI treatment of humans?
Wave Chronicle (23 Apirl 2015): "Analogies regarding tigers would only be valid if tigers had helped design human minds. Tigers show zero intelligent engineering of AI human brains. There is no AI design of precursor human brains by tigers. The point is our intelligent engineering of AI makes humans utterly different to any unintelligent species below us. Animals unable to create higher intelligence cannot be compared to humans creating AI."
"When pets, tigers, ants, spiders, wolves, gorillas, or any other animal can create greater intelligence than themselves, intelligence that dominates it, only then will the analogy be valid."
http://wavechronicle.com/wave/?p=5780
Originally shared by Singularity 2045
Whether or not human level #artificialintelligence will be safe or dangerous, it should be clear it's logically impossible to justify a supposed AI risk via citing human treatment of animals. The #logicalfallacy of AI danger based on animal-human relationships should not be allowed to continue.
Wozniak recently cited pet dogs to justify AI fear. Tegmark cited tigers to justify AI fear. Yudkowsky in the past cited wolves. Hugo de Garis cited mosquitoes and ants. Bostrom cited gorillas.
AI #scaremongering by the aforementioned people is a joke. Their logical fallacies are via irrational, highly unintelligent, but nobody until now has exposed their fallacious reasoning concerning their animals-analogy.
After considering the following quotes, do you agree comparing human treatment of animals cannot remotely define hypothetical super-AI treatment of humans?
Wave Chronicle (23 Apirl 2015): "Analogies regarding tigers would only be valid if tigers had helped design human minds. Tigers show zero intelligent engineering of AI human brains. There is no AI design of precursor human brains by tigers. The point is our intelligent engineering of AI makes humans utterly different to any unintelligent species below us. Animals unable to create higher intelligence cannot be compared to humans creating AI."
"When pets, tigers, ants, spiders, wolves, gorillas, or any other animal can create greater intelligence than themselves, intelligence that dominates it, only then will the analogy be valid."
http://wavechronicle.com/wave/?p=5780